as a rule, people use transit when it works and don’t when it doesn’t. this helps explain why oc transpo ridership is still at only 70 per cent of pre-pandemic levels.
after three years of inaction, decades of neglect, and several rounds of cuts to the bus fleet, it’s no wonder so few people are riding. to make matters worse, oc transpo wants to raise fares and
cut 15 connector routes that, somehow, don’t have enough riders despite graciously running four hours a day, four days a week. so rather than fixing that, the buses will be redeployed to “more important” routes, none of which include the city’s
10 most popular or t
hree worst performing.
a net reduction in service hours will mean worse service in many places, since new routes are being added at the expense of others being reduced, cut or overextended.
if we truly want a low-carbon, affordable, accessible city with less traffic and safer roads, we need good public transit for all. it’s not a lack of ideas or resources holding us back, but an absence of political ambition.
we should take a page from fellow canadian cities.
edmonton transit service fully recovered its ridership back in february by adding a high-frequency bus corridor and running more service on off-peak hours.
brampton transit has seen a 30 per cent increase above its 2019 ridership after years of expanding its bus fleet, implementing express routes and transit signal priority at stoplights, and bringing service into newer subdivisions.
charlottetown’s metro area has seen all-time record ridership for the last two years thanks to free transit for kindergarten-to-grade-12 students, $20 monthly adult passes, more routes and midday service, and bus stops near housing complexes. bc transit recently recovered 100 per cent of its pre-covid ridership with metro vancouver’s translink close behind at 90 per cent; express routes, new bus lanes, and more para transit service gave riders something
worth coming back to as they pursue a long-term plan to
double service by 2030.