advertisement

machado: survival predictions are based on math, science and past experience — but they aren't always accurate

people do beat the "odds." we don't know who will, and maybe not even why they do, but hopefully it's you and i, and everyone we care about.

people beat the "odds" all the time
guessing the chances of survival is a skillful combination of math and science and what happened the last time your doctor treated someone like you. getty
when my friend’s son was diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukemia (cml) — a rare blood cancer — in guatemala where he lived, the only outcome was death. despite the fact that cml treatment, which could be medication or a stem cell transplant, was available in many other parts of the world, there was no hope for anyone with cml in this central american country.
as a canadian, she sought help from canada’s children’s hospitals, including toronto’s sickkids. getting a reply to her many letters was the first victory. the second was the opportunity to talk with a cml specialist in canada about her son’s disease and prognosis — he was dying and time was running out.
ten per cent. that’s what the chances were that her son would live, according to this doctor, who then asked, “do you still want to try?”
looked at another way, he had a 90 per cent chance of dying. yikes.

when i was diagnosed with the same cancer, my doctor told me that i had a better chance of dying from being hit by a bus than dying from the cancer. it sounded promising at first, but if i thought about it too much, i became unclear of what it actually meant for me. after all, as random as being mowed down by a bus seems, it could happen. for example, in the u.k., roughly two people for every million will die in an accident involving a bus — there’s one chance in 305,644 for people living in the united states. not wildly likely, but not impossible either. so while the analogy was supposed to illustrate the low risk of dying from cml and thus ease my worry, it was such a random and obscure comparison that it didn’t give me a sense of prognosis-confidence that i could hang my hat on.

advertisement

advertisement

for sure, doctors do the best they can when it comes to guessing the chances of survival. it’s a skilful combination of math and science and what happened the last time they treated someone like you. using tools that help predict outcomes, research and clinical experience — probably a bit of instinct too — to inform their rhyming-off of percentages, they take somewhat educated guesses on whether your outcome will be roses and rainbows, or not. but there are other things too that can determine how much time you have, things that are difficult to include in these “guesses,” including health history, age, the stage of your disease, the effectiveness of your medication, frequency of monitoring and the quality of care you receive. even where you get care matters: research has shown that people who are treated at cancer centres live longer . add in the possible influence of a positive attitude, social support and coping abilities on slowing progression of disease and improving outcomes, and well, determining the odds of living or dying can seem like a bit of a, well, crapshoot.

and therein lies the difficulty of figuring out survival odds: you can’t, really. at least not exactly.

certainly, you probably wouldn’t bet on a horse that had just a 10 per cent chance of winning the race, or hire a contractor who had a 90 per cent failure rate, but when it comes to whether or not your life ends, hell ya, even a one per cent chance can feel like a decent shot. and since there are so many things that influence how the game plays out for each of us, it makes perfect sense that we try, regardless of the “odds.” consider scientist stephen hawking , who lived for more than 50 years with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (als), a devastating progressive disease that has no cure and usually kills people within two years of diagnosis or ontario-based denis raymond who has been living with glioblastoma — the same deadly brain cancer that killed the tragically hip’s gord downie — for six years, after doctors gave him little over one year to live. people do beat the “odds.” we don’t know who will, and maybe not even why they do — hopefully it’s you and i, and everyone we care about.

advertisement

advertisement

my friend’s kid sure did. despite the dismal 10-per-cent survival prediction, his mom “gave it a try.” it was a monumental effort, getting her sick child on a plane to canada, advocating for him and learning about his disease, but after a gruelling stem cell transplant at sickkids and a yearlong recovery, he is now a young adult with his whole life ahead of him. ask his mom now what she would have done with even worse odds, and she’ll tell you that she would have still tried.
thank goodness.
 
lisa machado is the executive producer of advocacy & better health. she can be reached at lmachado@postmedia.com.
lisa machado
lisa machado

lisa machado began her journalism career as a financial reporter with investor's digest and then rogers media. after a few years editing and writing for a financial magazine, she tried her hand at custom publishing and then left to launch a canadian women's magazine with a colleague. after being diagnosed with a rare blood cancer, lisa founded the canadian cml network and shifted her focus to healthcare advocacy and education.

read more about the author

comments

postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. we ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. we have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. visit our community guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.