according to dr. richard gunderman, a professor at indiana university, the answer is no. in fact, “contact between a doctor’s hand and a patient appears to be on its way out,” he says.
with doctors under pressure to see patients in less time than ever before, a plethora of diagnostic tools that make contact between doctor and patient redundant, and the increasing use of virtual technology for appointments, there’s just no time for touch. and it’s a great loss for us.
“despite the rise of scanners, robots and other new medical technologies, the physician’s hand remains one of medicine’s most valuable diagnostic tools,” he writes in an article for the conversation. “touch creates a human bond that is particularly needed in this increasingly hands-off, impersonal age.”
he also talks about the critical role of touch in the building of connections and community. and yet, it doesn’t seem to matter, if the woman in braids’ perspective is accurate. like so many other things in health care, it’s every person for themselves when it comes to social touch in today’s post-pandemic world. and every caregiver for the people they look after.
it’s worth noting too, however, that satisfying your innate need for touch doesn’t have to mean skin-to-skin contact with another human — especially if that’s not your thing. so don’t get weird about it.
try
massage therapy, or a spa treatment that involves touch, like a pedicure or a facial. weighted blankets and cuddling pets have also been shown to emulate the same positive nervous system response as physical touch. long showers or baths are other
options
.