“we haven’t had a breakthrough in [alzheimer’s disease] in twenty years,” says sivananthan. “twenty years! so before we talk about whether or not it should have been approved, let’s talk about why that is.”
sivananthan, a n
euroscientist and the
chief of research & kte at the alzheimer society of canada, says that canada’s investment in dementia has been dismal at best, especially considering the numbers of canadians who are currently affected — about half a million. it’s a number that’s expected to double in less than ten years.
“
we lag in every country in the g7 in terms of how much money we put towards research in this area,” she says. “globally, the funding is so little … it’s unacceptable.”
it’s no surprise, then, that sivananthan is watching the developments closely.
the drug
came under scrutiny
after it won fda approval despite warnings from the peripheral and central nervous system drugs advisory committee.
it took seven hours
for the committee, which provides the fda with recommendations on the safety and efficacy of treatment of neurologic disease treatments, to vote against the suggestion that the treatment had any benefit for patients.
but despite the doubts of the independent advisors, the agency decided that the drug, which is given by infusion every four weeks at a doctor’s office or hospital, showed enough promise of helping patients, and submitted aducanumab for accelerated approval — a process designed to provide earlier access to therapies where there is unmet need.