facility after facility followed in the next three months, with tragic results: nine resident deaths and at least 39 testing positive as covid-19 swept luther special care home. at regina’s santa maria, 16 residents died, while 84 residents and 22 staff were infected.but the worst toll was at extendicare parkside.more than 200 residents and staff tested positive at the regina home, with 41 residents dying. extendicare, which owns five facilities across the province, is the only for-profit long-term care provider in saskatchewan.
the company has come under heavy fire throughout the pandemic for its use of four-bed rooms and alleged understaffing.in an emailed statement, extendicare said parkside had a “full staff complement” when the outbreak started, but said the difficulties came when numerous staff were forced to self-isolate, making it “very difficult to meet resident needs and combat the outbreak.” at that point, extendicare said it reached out to the sha for help and
within a few days, a co-management agreement had been signed.as of feb. 24, 43 saskatchewan long-term care homes have reported outbreaks and a total of 120 residents have died after testing covid-19 positive, according to the provincial government.
after years of warning signs and health-care worker unions sounding alarm bells, it took a pandemic to cast a spotlight on the realities inside saskatchewan’s long-term care homes.
pandemic exacerbated longstanding issue of understaffing
two long-term care workers spoke to the leader-post on the condition of anonymity for fear of losing their jobs. they recounted years of working short-staffed, of not being able to meet all their residents’ needs and of feeling demoralized by their inability to care for their residents well.for one continuing care assistant (cca) who has worked in a long-term care facility in southern saskatchewan for 35 years, it took an outbreak for staffing levels in her facility to temporarily improve.of her facility’s 125 residents, she said she is typically responsible for 22 of them together with one other cca. but if the home is short-staffed that day, she winds up looking after all 22 on her own and is left scrambling to find another staff member to help her every time she needs to lift or move a resident. she estimated her residents pull their buzzers for help around 75 times per shift.her facility has long had what she called a “non-replacement policy,” so if a staff member calls in sick or has to take time off work for another reason, that person is not replaced.“then we work short. they don’t like us to say that, but that’s what we call it,” the cca said.this practice continued until an outbreak was declared in the facility.“when we were positive in our facility, they gave us extra staff, they replaced everybody … as soon as that outbreak was over, it went back to not replacing,” she said.“we just don’t have the time to spend with (residents), so instead of doing 20 minutes of care, you’re doing 10. you’re finding shortcuts as much as you can. sometimes their care doesn’t get done.”barbara cape, president of seiu-west, which represents many of the province’s long-term care workers, said this type of non-replacement practice is common because homes can save costs on overtime. she said it leads to a lower quality of care and is “shortchanging” the province’s seniors.