as promising as
merck’s experimental covid oral drug
is, it shouldn’t be interpreted as an alternative to the covid vaccine, according to a scientist who worked on the research.
dr. matthias götte
, a professor of medical microbiology and immunology at the university of alberta, led the team that demonstrated how molnupiravir works at attacking the virus that causes covid in the human body. that research was crucial to merck’s announcement last week that it’s seeking regulatory approval for its covid-fighting drug.
but götte wants to make it clear that molnupiravir is not a replacement for the covid vaccine. “it’s extremely important to have another tool in the toolbox,” he told healthing from his office in edmonton. “this is another tool.”
molnupiravir essentially causes an error in the sars-cov-2 virus. the part of the virus that replicates itself
mistakes molnupiravir for part of its viral genome, and when it does that, it adds molnupiravir to the virus it’s replicating, rendering it no longer a threat.
in clinical trials, it reduced the risk of hospitalization or death by 50 per cent. out of 775 unvaccinated patients who had contracted covid, 7.3 per cent who had received the drug were hospitalized 29 days after treatment. in the placebo group, 14.1 per cent were hospitalized, and some had died. and one of the major benefits of molnupiravir is that it can be taken as a drug, unlike previous covid therapies.