“what is being decided, with little thought or discussion, is whether individuals have the right to medical choice, bodily sovereignty, and informed consent, and whether parents have the right to make medical decisions for their children, or whether medical choice belongs to the state.”
in march, kuntz was interviewed on faytene tv, a youtube channel hosted by b.c.-based, christian evangelist faytene kryskow, who made it clear that she is not opposed to vaccinations. as part of its ban on vaccine dis- and misinformation, youtube removed the video after i viewed it.
kuntz railed against public health officers and mainstream media.
“look at the science or lack of it and a reasonable risk-benefit analysis,” he said. “there is no good reason to be taking this vaccine or this medical product. we shouldn’t even be calling it a vaccine.”
he decried the “censorship of world-class scientists and researchers.” and in his common ground article headlined say no to medical apartheid, kuntz said that there is “robust evidence that ivermectin reduces mortality by 80 per cent.”
that’s not true, according to ivermectin maker, merck. in a statement earlier this year, merck said its analysis of emerging studies found: “no scientific basis for a potential therapeutic effect against covid-19,” no evidence of clinical efficacy in covid patients, and “a concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies.”