a mandatory covid-19 testing policy for employees of a retirement home
was recently upheld
on the basis that the intrusion into privacy was justified, despite the fact that other safety measures were already in place and no outbreak had yet occurred.
in arriving at this conclusion, the arbitrator noted that testing was invasive and imperfect but the consequences of an outbreak were more dire.
by contrast, arbitrators have previously been divided about employer policies concerning seasonal flu vaccination, with some arbitrators finding them to be reasonable,
while others have disagreed
. again, decisions are fact-dependent. the fact that covid-19 is a much deadlier virus than seasonal flu, and that current vaccines are
much more effective,
matters.
collective agreement language, too, is relevant. in cases where workplace vaccination policies have not been upheld, language in the agreement permitting vaccine refusal was a factor.
laws could require vaccination
mandating vaccination through laws is another possibility. previously, attempts to do so have mostly,
but not only
, been concerned with admission to schools.
existing school-entry vaccination laws, however, allow parents to easily obtain exemptions. vaccination, in fact, is not actually mandatory for school admissions. the most recent attempt to limit these exemptions to cases of medical need was narrowly defeated
earlier this year
in new brunswick.