but at the end, the premier got a standing ovation. the riding even pledged support for her in the review vote.
that reflected the ambiguity of the angry. they’re upset that she seems to be backing away from their issues, but still believe she can come around.
to do that, smith would have to ban covid vaccinations, allow doctors to prescribe non-approved medication, enact an alberta pension plan without a referendum, abandon net-zero emissions targets, and a whole lot more.
the questions reflected mistrust of smith’s caucus.
one said: “how do you balance your loyalty between the grassroots voters, who supported and continue to support you as leader, and the established members of your legislature who are still working against your leadership?”
smith said her group of mlas is united. but those who suspect it isn’t have precedent on their side. some of kenney’s harshest and most effective critics were in his own caucus.
in a string of emails exchanged before the meeting, and later sent to me, one member of the calgary-lougheed board said:
“i too have felt that there has been more pandering to the elusive ndp voter and legacy media, than to the sidelined ucp base in the last election.”
another person who was at the meeting said: “she has three months to get it right. otherwise, there’s a problem.”