advertisement

appeal court overturns sask. man's attempted murder conviction

a "miscarriage of justice" occurred during cory james smockum's 2020 jury trial in saskatoon, the appeal judges ruled in a written decision.

appeal court overturns sask. man's attempted murder conviction
cory james smockum was convicted by a saskatoon jury in 2020 of attempted murder for choking and beating his former girlfriend in a hanley garage in 2018. on aug. 16, 2024, the saskatchewan court of appeal overturned the conviction and ordered a new trial. saskatoon

saskatchewan’s court of appeal ruled a man convicted of beating and choking his ex-girlfriend in a garage in hanley will be retried for attempted murder.

cory james smockum’s conviction was overturned due to a “miscarriage of justice” during his 2020 jury trial in saskatoon, the appeal judges concluded in a written decision released friday.
in his appeal, heard in may, smockum argued the crown’s “improper” cross-examination “had an unfairly prejudicial effect on the jury and rendered the trial unfair, thus necessitating a new trial.”
“crown counsel employed sarcasm, expressed a contemptuous attitude toward the accused, expressed personal opinions disguised as questions, inserted argument into their questioning, and utilized language that was intended to inflame the jury,” smockum’s factum stated.
the appeal judges ruled that while some of crown prosecutor carla dewar’s questioning “tested the limits,” it was overall appropriate for the issues at stake —  demonstrating that smockum’s actions were an extension of his controlling nature rather than a response to a perceived threat.
it only amounted to a miscarriage of justice when combined with other legal errors made at trial, justice georgina jackson concluded, with justices jerome tholl and jeffery kalmakoff agreeing.

advertisement

advertisement

the judges ruled that the crown shouldn’t have been allowed to ask smockum why he hadn’t told police he acted in self-defence — breaching his right to silence with authorities — or to elicit evidence intended to demonstrate his “bad character.”
the jury was left with inadmissible and prejudicial evidence, lacking adequate instruction from the trial judge about the possibility of self-defence, jackson concluded.
making a finding of fact after the conviction, saskatoon king’s bench justice grant currie determined the jury believed smockum attacked his former girlfriend, who had attended a quad rally with him in hanley, in a garage after an intoxicated argument on oct. 13, 2018.
the jury heard smockum then called her family, told them he was going to kill her, and left with her on a quad, which she later escaped.

in 2022, smockum was designated a dangerous offender and sentenced to an indeterminate prison term. currie  found he demonstrated a pattern of repetitive and uncontrollable violence toward both women and men that “constitutes a threat to the life, safety or physical or mental well-being of other persons.”

smockum also appealed his sentence — a moot point since his conviction was overturned.

advertisement

advertisement

his ex, then 30, testified that smockum choked her unconscious three times and told her she was going to die. she spent eight days in hospital with broken ribs, a brain bleed, black eyes and bruising to her neck and throat.
smockum testified that he punched her twice in the face and grabbed her throat after she hit him on the head and in the ribs with a hammer, which she denied.
at the appeal hearing, the crown argued that “(t)here was no evidence in the case to suggest that the appellant believed on reasonable grounds that his own safety and survival depended on killing (her) in the garage.”
the appeal judges determined that currie didn’t instruct the jury as to when they must acquit someone on self-defence, and failed to include instructions regarding the crown’s burden to disprove self-defence.
smockum also argued that the jury should have been given the option of convicting him of aggravated assault instead of attempted murder.
“i do not find that the trial judge erred by not instructing the jury with respect to an included offence of aggravated assault or some other assault-based charge when the jury was charged on attempted murder,” jackson wrote.

the saskatoon star phoenix has created an afternoon headlines newsletter that can be delivered daily to your inbox so you are up to date with the most vital news of the day. click here to subscribe.

with some online platforms blocking access to the journalism upon which you depend, our website is your destination for up-to-the-minute news, so make sure to bookmark thestarphoenix.com and sign up for our newsletters so we can keep you informed. click here to subscribe.

bre mcadam, saskatoon starphoenix
bre mcadam, saskatoon starphoenix
read more about the author

comments

postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. we ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. we have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. visit our community guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.