in the first instance the panel found that denis received significant confidential information from the driver and her father “which he either failed to recognize or failed to relay to his firm’s conflict officer.”
“while mr. denis denies that he chose the better client because she had the better claim, public perception would likely see this differently,” they wrote.
“the committee finds that mr. denis committed significantly more than a ‘technical’ breach of the code.”
they also rejected arguments from denis’ lawyer, alain hepner, that the former justice minister’s conduct in that instance wasn’t deserving of sanction.
“he argues that good faith, sincerely held beliefs, and due diligence of the lawyer are evidence that the conduct will not reach the threshold of ‘marked departure’ of conduct expected of the lawyer and is therefore not deserving of sanction.
“the cases cited … do not support his arguments. inadvertence, good faith, honest but mistaken understanding and other non-willful conduct are not sufficient to avoid a finding of sanctionable conduct.”
in the second case denis was approached to help a couple after the husband’s extramarital affair with another woman ended and she had emailed the wife to tell her about the affair.