deachman: mark sutcliffe says voters have a 'clear choice' of visions for ottawa, and he's right
the former journalist and community activist laid out a vision for ottawa that he says is balanced and reasonable, rather than the 'hard left' turn that catherine mckenney represents
4 minute read
we apologize, but this video has failed to load.
try refreshing your browser, or
tap here to see other videos from our team.
tap here to see other videos from our team.
mayoral candidate mark sutcliffe makes a clear distinction between the paths he and catherine mckenney are taking, in what he describes as essentially a two-person race for the city’s top job. his is that of the balanced conciliator willing to listen to and work with others, regardless of where on the political spectrum they call home. his tenure, he promises, will not see a polarizing “sutcliffe club” on city council, of the sort for which mayor jim watson was frequently criticized. the path he’s walking, then, is straight down the middle of the road, a road where pedestrians, cyclists, motorists and public-transit users will somehow sort out their differences without a war being waged on one or the other.
by contrast, the path mckenney is on, he believes, represents a “hard left turn,” despite what sutcliffe claims are more recent efforts by the “activist” mckenney to appeal to centrist voters.
“the people of ottawa have a clear choice between catherine’s vision for ottawa and my vision for ottawa,” he said tuesday in a 75-minute discussion with this newspaper’s editorial board.
sutcliffe also told this newspaper he:
- opposes the idea of a sixth crossing over the ottawa river, arguing that a tunnel under king edward is the best solution to the problem of trucks rumbling through downtown
- wants to have a “rational discussion” about security and the future of wellington street, which has been closed to traffic since the “freedom convoy” took it over last winter. he added that he’s not opposed to reopening it, but believes any decision should be part of a bigger discussion about the future of downtown ottawa
- suggests that, if elected, he would not want to run for more than two terms
- does not yet know what he might propose as a municipal tax hike if elected, adding that his campaign was close to releasing a financial platform soon. why the delay? he said he wanted to provide voters with a thoughtful answer that reflected reality, including “the (projected) $85 million deficit at oc transpo, which is probably only going to get bigger between now and the end of the year”
advertisement
“there’s a lot of anxiety about the future of ottawa. there’s a lot of immediate anxiety around issues like affordability and the future of downtown and the future of our economy, and housing, and other issues like that,” he said, arguing those problems need a balanced, practical approach.
“i think the platform that catherine is proposing is one that is going to be expensive. it’s going to result in bigger tax increases.”
mckenney (who uses they/them pronouns) has promised to spend $250 million over the next four years to improve ottawa’s cycling network. they have also vowed to end chronic and family homelessness in ottawa during their first term; freeze public transit fares — and make it free to those 17 and younger, and move ottawa to net zero emissions by 2050.
indeed, it appears that sutcliffe’s fundamental differences with mckenney were a factor in his decision in june to run for the top job. he denied the suggestion that watson or anyone else put him up to running, conceding only that numerous people over the years have suggested he run for office.
“if you’d asked me, in march or april, i would have said, ‘i will probably never run for office. i’m happy with the life i have now.’ but increasingly, i heard more and more concerns about the future of ottawa, and i saw a race that was shaping up without a strong, balanced approach being on the table.”
advertisement
that balanced approach would not, for example, borrow $250 million for bike lanes, a swipe at mckenney’s plan.
“it’s a great idea to think ‘let’s make ottawa a world-class cycling city.’ but we have a lot of winter in ottawa. and we have a lot of roads that need repairing. and we have to make choices. if you’re investing $250 million in bike lanes, you’re not investing somewhere else. that’s just a reality.”
on tuesday, he said that he thought he could keep tax increases low by finding efficiencies and improvements in the city’s operations without job losses or “cutting significantly into the services that people want and care about.”
sutcliffe reiterated that he would not be a “big projects” type of mayor.
“i have kids — maybe someday i’ll have grandkids — and i want them to grow up in the same kind of city i grew up in, that was safe and affordable.”
sutcliffe’s vision for ottawa isn’t what a lot of people would describe as particularly “visionary.” that is, it’s safe rather than imaginative, more cautious than daring. it is, in a word, very ottawa. and he’s right that voters have a choice of two very different paths.
share story
