in the spring of 2017, the woman informed her bank her debit card had been stolen and she had noticed transactions being made without her knowledge: 32 in just one month, totalling $12,000.
after the transactions were traced back to him, gordon agreed to pay the money back. but in 2019, for reasons not explained in the judgment, the woman
signed documents giving gordon control of her finances
. (the judge questioned whether she would have been able to consent to this, given her state.)
in march of 2020, gordon was intercepted by police in a matter not related to the case. when officers found two of the woman’s credit cards and a bank statement in his wallet, he said he had them because he’s her nephew.
police opened an investigation. at the same time, they contacted the woman’s clinic to warn them of the situation. the clinic contacted gordon, who argued he was only using the woman’s money to help her, including by paying people to visit her.
the human rights tribunal ruled otherwise.
“the tribunal finds that mr. gordon took advantage of his position of strength with regard to (the victim), who was very vulnerable, in order to enrich himself at her expense,” pilon wrote.
overall, it was established that between 2017 and 2020, gordon withdrew just over $184,700 from her bank account. he used her cards for cash withdrawals at various branches and also made cheques out in his name, the decision says, which were immediately deposited into his own account.