the inability to find a common term to describe black people in canadian health research can perpetuate inequities, a university of ottawa professor says.
we need precise, accurate language because research informs public health policies, training for health-care workers and culturally appropriate and antiracist health-care practices, says dr. jude mary cénat, an associate professor of psychology and the director of university of ottawa’s interdisciplinary centre for black health, canada’s first academic research centre dedicated to studying the biological, social and cultural determinants of health for black communities.
in canadian health-care research, the definition of “who is black” can vary widely. terms such as “african-canadian,” “caribbean” and “african” are inconsistent and make it difficult to compare studies, he says.
the terms may include people who do not identify as black, such as those who are from north africa, and people from caribbean nations including cuba, the dominican republic and puerto rico, who consider themselves to be latin american.
from a health research point of view, that can be a problem, cénat says. one example: a 2019 review of breast and cervical cancer among “black canadian” women included 23 studies, but only seven had unambiguously black participants. some studies considered “africa” as a single block and included participants from north africa, who may self-identify as arab.