kurtis doney, director of water, waste and environment for the city, was not able to offer a figure but said a dollar amount could be provided at a later date.
stadnichuk asked what the administration’s reasoning is for switching all waste collection to a user fee instead of attaching it to property taxes.
kim onrait, executive director of citizen services, said a user fee puts more control in the hands of the resident since they are able to choose the size of their waste bin. city administration has said that an ability to opt-out of the green collection would undercut the goal of the program and would make it difficult to administer.
stadnichuk moved an amendment to adopt “option 2” in the report, which would see recycling and food waste be covered by property tax while garbage collection charged through a user fee.
“i think this is the more fair option,” stadnichuk said.
the amendment was defeated 4-7 with stevens, stadnichuk, coun. john findura (ward 5) and leblanc voting in favour.
“i think we should side with a less regressive model,” said stevens, adding that he would like to see all waste collection attached to property tax.
the report to city council describes the green bin program as a “scrape the plate” program where oils, fats, grease, bones and dairy products can all go into the bin. for people who already have compost programs, these organic materials typically would not be eligible for a backyard compost bin.