but in a 33-page decision released nov. 28, three court of appeal justices ruled “this was a miscarriage of justice,” accusing the windsor judge of a “lack of procedural fairness” in ignoring some of the trial evidence.
gorges maintained his innocence throughout the trial. the defence pointed to prior interactions between the accused and the complainant and that they had had discussions “about him potentially helping with her work as an escort,” according to the appeal court overview of the case.
“the trial judge erred in disregarding some of the complainant’s evidence regarding her work in the sex trade,” justice lise favreau wrote in a decision approved by two other court of appeal justices. the woman cannot be identified due to a court order.
while complainants have certain rights in such criminal proceedings, the trial judge “violated the accused’s rights to procedural fairness,” windsor lawyer julie santarossa, who argued gorges’s appeal case, told the star.
what happens next is in the crown’s court, including “wiping the conviction from the record,” according to santarossa, or arranging a new trial or appealing the higher court’s decision.
the windsor-essex crown attorney’s office advised the star in an email thursday that the court of appeal decision is “currently under review … there are no additional details to share at this time.”