by: elise stoltewhen dr. jasneet parmar’s father was in long-term care, she would visit daily, putting in his hearing aids to share world news, rubbing cream all over his skin and spoon-feeding him. she noticed his urinary tract infection; she recognized the signs when he was dying.parmar is not only a family member with hands-on experience caring for the elderly. she’s also a physician and university of alberta researcher in family-based care. with that unique set of skills, she’s been lobbying for alberta health to recognize the critical bonds cut by pandemic restrictions this year.before covid-19, family members provided up to 30 per cent of hands-on care, such as toileting and feeding, in long-term care facilities, plus emotional and cognitive support, said parmar.that unacknowledged support evaporated the moment alberta health banned “visitors” from care facilities last spring.it’s hard to quantify the effects of that dramatic move. looking at death rates, 143 long-term care residents in alberta died with covid-19 during the first wave. but many others died from other causes; these frail long-term care residents only live on average one year after admission. researchers can calculate excess death by comparing the number who died during spring 2020 of all causes (1,813 residents) and the five year average.there were 234 excess deaths that spring, according to recently-released data from the
canadian institute of health information.if the real cause of death was loneliness or missing family care, we’ll never know.
globally, health advocates have come to see covid-19 and long-term care as a cautionary tale. amid the fear and chaos of the early response, many jurisdictions reversed decades of work, leaving their commitment to centre patient and family voices “hanging in the breeze,” in the words of one editorial
in the british medical journal.“this was regrettable,” argued the doctors. “their input … might have prevented at least some of the excess morbidity and mortality.”canadian doctors added their voices, too. by july, chief medical officer of health dr. deena hinshaw changed the alberta orders to allow up to two family members in and deliberately called them “support persons” rather than visitors.but the issue lingered. many facility operators could not or would not accommodate resident/family access. especially as outbreaks surged again during the second wave, some operators shut down completely, limited appointments to weekday hours or made just a few spots available per week.today, residents and families still wait painfully for a promised new set of access rules.but parmar is hopeful alberta health won’t simply restore the status quo — when dedicated spouses and children were often an unrecognized, shadow workforce. “i am very optimistic that changes are coming and it’s going to be better than before the pandemic.”
isolation and imprisonment
through groundwork, the
edmonton journal’s pilot project in engagement journalism, families came forward to talk about the isolation, lack of voice and feelings of imprisonment.