the second version was more definitive, including a lengthy analysis, a survey of industry experts and several appendices intended to lend more credibility to the final number.
the key element was a 36-page risk management report prepared for the treasury board branch of the ministry of finance.
“risk management takes a systematic approach to risk, estimating the range of potential impacts on a risk-by-risk-basis through the project’s planning, procurement, design and construction and operating process,” the report read in part.
to that end, the dozen or so members of the assessment team, public and private, identified and weighed 32 separate factors in reaching their conclusions about the potential risks.
all details regarding the 32 factors were blanked out in the report before it was made public, leaving no way to assess how each played out over the ensuing two years.
still, “a failure to fully take account of risk is one of the key factors when public projects are not delivered on time, on budget or to specification,” said the report in a passage freighted with irony in light of the latest development.
the new democrats framed the business case as a take-it-to-the-bank costing for the project at the time of its release on july 14, 2022.