“there are many moving pieces to this story,” says sandy smith, a forestry professor at the university of toronto. her research focuses on forest entomology and insect behaviour. “i don’t want to discount climate change, but ticks are pretty resilient organisms. like most insects that have evolved, they would be able to handle cold temperatures,” she says.
smith adds that there is a human factor that often gets overlooked in these discussions. she notes that before europeans settled in north america, deer populations on this continent were much sparser than they are now.
“we moved into these areas, and with that we brought land-use changes that mean the tick’s hosts are more abundant. i think that’s equal to climate change,” she says. “there are a lot more deer in the landscape than there ever used to be, as well as more deer mice and field mice. and with warmer winters, you have better survival of ticks, and more hosts and more opportunity for disease to move between them.”
as an independent tick researcher, john scott has been studying ticks for several decades. he questions whether the range of black-legged ticks is expanding as rapidly as is often reported, citing a lack of comprehensive tick population monitoring and a recent canada-wide increase in public awareness, both of which can lead to the perception that we are in the midst of a rapid increase that may not mesh with reality. even if that increase is occurring, scott believes it’s a mistake to point the finger at climate change, since the data collected to date is far from conclusive.