“this valuable rwe, while it’s being accepted elsewhere, hasn’t been considered in canada for adult patients like bryce,” says dr. lawrence korngut, neuromuscular neurologist at the university of calgary. “to mandate that only clinical trial data is of value here is creating a scenario that i feel is inequitable because i don’t believe it’s feasible to even conduct a clinical trial with adult patients, which are a subgroup of an already-small rare disease patient population, and where the treatment is already approved by health canada and is available for them in other jurisdictions including quebec.”
dr. lawrence korngut, neuromuscular neurologist at the university of calgary credit: supplied
rwe can be used to help inform access decisions based on broader populations versus the limited sample sizes inherent in clinical trials that study rare diseases. according to dr. korngut, it also provides rich scientific insight into the effectiveness of treatment for a range of adult patients and informs about its long-term safety.
“we have multiple studies using rwe from around the world all lining up and demonstrating that firstly, adult patients with sma who don’t get treatment get worse over time, and secondly, that patients on treatment improve over time,” he says. “everyone agrees that treatment coverage decisions need to be rational and based on data. it’s equally important, however, that access is equitable to the patient community and that’s where the concern lies, from my end and for many of my colleagues as well.”