by idil abdillahi, anne rucchetto
in december 2021, christopher wallis and colleagues published an article in
jama surgery
with a starkly grim revelation: between november 2020 and march 2021, women in ontario who underwent surgery were 32 per cent more likely to die if operated on by a male surgeon rather than a female surgeon and 15 per cent more likely to suffer a negative outcome of any kind. men operated on by female surgeons, on the other hand, were only 2 per cent more likely to
have complications
though this study’s shocking findings have been
shared
widely
across
international
news
outlets
, the response in ontario is chillingly silent. as angela jerath, a co-author on the study said to
the guardian,
“this result has real-world medical consequences for female patients and manifests itself in more complications, readmissions to hospital and death for females compared with males. we have demonstrated in our paper that we are failing some female patients and that some are unnecessarily falling through the cracks with adverse, and sometimes fatal, consequences.”
the ontario college of physicians and surgeons has yet to publicly acknowledge these findings, failing to speak to the ways that death is a preventable outcome for women accessing surgeries in the province. this reality not only warrants concerted action but also demonstrates that despite social and political advancements in gender equity, women continue to experience disproportionate harms in the equitable distribution of health-care and positive health outcomes. though this research reported on people identified via the gender binary, these findings warrant further investigation into the outcomes that gender-diverse people (e.g., two-spirit, transgendered, non-binary and gender-fluid) experience during surgery, given the
known
barriers
faced for these populations when attempting to access primary, emergency and gender-affirming care.