for example, let’s say you file a claim related to anxiety, but the insurance company’s investigation reveals you were previously treated for depression. because mental health ailments such as depression and anxiety are commonly combined, your claim will be denied based on a pre-existing condition.
case managers with a hard-line attitude.
case managers often treat legitimate claims with suspicion, and once they make a decision, it’s difficult to change their position, even when new information is provided. we often hear from clients that their case managers don’t believe them and make them jump through hoops to supply more and more information for their claim. for some, the constant phone calls and emails are so stressful that their mental health declines even more.
but if a lawsuit is submitted for a claim that was denied, the case goes to the insurance company’s lawyer who looks at the case in a much different light than the case manager does. it’s also important to be aware that insurance companies have to consider the cost of fighting a lawsuit and possibly losing in court — often, settling is the best option for everyone.
biased medical reports.
insurance companies retain independent medical examiners, who frequently decide that claimants are able to work — despite the fact that they have never met or examined them. in many cases, these medical consultants haven’t even received the complete record of medical evidence from all the treating professionals, so their determination is based on limited and incomplete information. the best way to counter a biased medical examiner opinion is by providing solid evidence from medical experts, including from the professionals directly involved in treatment.