the mris provided by prenuvo check for hundreds of diseases, some of which can be life-threatening, before a person even experiences symptoms. the current consensus amongst celebrities and those who can afford the scans is that if they can find out about their current state of health sooner, why wouldn’t they want to try it out?
however, medical professionals have more to say about this newly used preventative healthcare tool, and it’s not all positive.
the mri debate
many medical professionals have spoken out against the use of mri technology full-body scans.
dr. dhruv khullar, a physician based in new york and a new yorker writer, spoke to matt galloway, host of the current, a radio show on cbc radio one, on the subject, saying, “these things don’t have a lot of evidence, and we should be very cautious before we advise people to get something like this.”
dr. khullar’s reservations on the topic stem from the fact that the claim that these scans help people take their health into their own hands is only partially true.
“people may experience anxiety. they may receive false positive test results. they may be diagnosed with conditions that might never end up hurting them,” he said.
he knows from experience, too. he went ahead and got a whole body mri and found a lesion on his prostate, a lesion that turned out to be an asymptomatic abnormality. the result led to an anxious need to get more tests to confirm or denounce whether or not it’s going to negatively affect his overall health.